Legal Opinion

Herzfeld & Stern, a Partnership v. Albert J. Blair, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 30, 1985No. 83-2495PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is thereby submitted without oral argument.

This is an appeal from the denial of appellant’s motions for new trial and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. In the underlying action, plaintiff-appellee Herzfeld, a stockbroker, asserted defendant-appellant Blair had failed to pay for stock purchased for him by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Colon-Sanchez v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  3. Tom Moulton v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  4. Gladwin C. Lamb v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Braley v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  2. Renetta M. Miera v. Dairyland Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  3. Coghlan v. StarkeyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  4. Castillo v. Koppes-ConwayColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. NBZ, INC. v. PilarskiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API