Legal Opinion

Gladwin C. Lamb v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 4, 1984No. 83-1899PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This is an appeal from an order of the tax court dismissing the taxpayer’s petition seeking a redetermination of deficiencies and determining that deficiencies in income tax and additions to tax are due from the taxpayer for the years 1977,1978 and 1979. We affirm.

In his petition, the taxpayer alleged that he did not owe any taxes, penalties or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Norman E. McCoy and Mary Louise McCoy v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Clarence W. Steinbrecher and Jeannette D. Steinbrecher v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  5. Whitney v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. John M. Casper v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  2. Irwin Schiff v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  3. Herzfeld & Stern, a Partnership v. Albert J. Blair, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  4. John L. Clark v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  5. Glenda Miera v. First Security Bank of Utah, N.A., a Utah CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API