Thompson v. Shevlin

In this action for legal services, the defendants seek an order to preclude the plaintiff from proving the value of Ms services as well as other matters claimed in the complaint.

In response to a demand, the plaintiff served a bill of particulars on March 10, 1964. Because of claimed deficiencies, the *1079defendants moved for a further bill on March 19 and an order was then entered which required the plaintiff to state by whom he had been retained and for whom the services had been performed; the nature of the services performed as well as the value thereof; and also the dates of any demands made…