Legal Opinion

Gormly v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 18, 1914PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Clarence W. Gormly, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 26th day of October, 1914, requiring him to furnish a bill of particulars.

1Opinion of the Court

Laughlin, J.:

The plaintiff and defendants are attorneys and counselors at law, and the action is to recover on a quantum, meruit for professional services alleged to have been rendered by plaintiff to defendants at their special instance and request between the 1st day of January, 1913, and the twenty-sixth day of November of the same year. The answers put in issue all the material allegations of the complaint, with the exception of the averment that the parties are attorneys.

The order made on application of defendant Smith requires that a bill of particulars be served with respect to seven…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pace v. AmendAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carroad v. RegensburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  2. Times Square Improvement Co. v. Fleischmann Vienna Model Bakery, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  3. Rosenzweig v. LarkinCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934
  4. Runals v. Niagara UniversityNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Keller v. National Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API