Legal Opinion

Eversman v. Ray Shipman Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1926No. 19554PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.

This case involves an interpretation of Sections 5509 to 5513, inclusive, General Code, which sections contain the following pertinent provisions:

Section 5509: “If a corporation * * * required by tbe provisions of this act, to file any report or returns or to pay any tax or fee, * * * fails or neglects to make any sucb report or return or to pay any such tax or fee for ninety days after the time prescribed in this act * * * the commission shall certify such fact to the secretary of state. The secretary of state shall thereupon cancel the articles of incorporation of any such corporation * * *…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. List v. Burley Tobacco Growers' Co-Operative Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. American Soap Co. v. BogueOhio Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re HareDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1962
  2. Chatman v. DayOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. GMS Management Co. v. AxeCity of Cleveland Municipal Court · 1982
  4. Sweeny v. Keystone Driller Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Columbia Real Estate Title Insurance v. Columbia Title Agency, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API