Legal Opinion

Chatman v. Day

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1982No. 7522PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcBride, J.

The second assignment presents the question of the liability of a principal officer of a corporation who continues to conduct business and to create obligations after a corporate charter has been canceled.

The complaint in the municipal court alleged a simple claim for damages for failure to substantially perform in a workmanlike manner the construction of a garage on the premises of the plaintiffs. The action was brought and the defendant served as Earl Day, individually, d.b.a. Peach Tree South, Inc. In response, a general denial was filed by the defendant, individually. Included in the same…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eversman v. Ray Shipman Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Sweeny v. Keystone Driller Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1930
  3. I. J. Goldstein Co. v. MitchellOhio Court of Appeals · 1921

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Clark-Franklin-Kingston Press, Inc. v. RomanoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  2. Columbia Real Estate Title Insurance v. Columbia Title Agency, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Nabakowski v. 5400 CorporationOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Bob's Beverage, Inc. v. Acme, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
  5. MacK Construction Development Corp. v. Austin Smith Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API