Legal Opinion

Henning v. Kyle

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 21, 1949No. Record 3536PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

Betty K. Kyle and Z. T. Kyle, plaintiffs below and here ■so designated, instituted this action against Ruth S. Henning,who will be hereinafter referred to as defendant. They claimed damages for alleged breach of contract because of defendant’s refusal to pay for certain real estate that she had agreed to purchase from them. Two jury trials were had. On the first, a verdict was returned substantially in favor of defendant. It is in the following words and figures:

“We the jury on the issue joined, find for the defendant but agree that she should forfeit her deposit of $705.00, and be required…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. West End Real Estate Co. v. ClaiborneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
  2. Lake v. TyreeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1894
  3. Masche v. NicholsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  4. Wren v. MoncureSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lambert v. Downtown Garage, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  2. Poe v. VossSupreme Court of Virginia · 1955
  3. Tate v. Colony House Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1999
  4. Piedmont Trust Bank v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1969
  5. DeJarnette v. Thomas M. Brooks Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API