Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Mayo

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 17, 1960PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

121 So.2d 424 (1960)

John P. SULLIVAN, Petitioner,

v.

Nathan MAYO, Commissioner of Agriculture, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

Nathan MAYO, As Commissioner of Agriculture, of the State of Florida, and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, a Corporation, Petitioners,

v.

John P. SULLIVAN and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 17, 1960.

W.J. Oven, Jr., and Caldwell, Parker, Foster, Madigan, Oven & Moriarty, Tallahassee, for John P. Sullivan, petitioner-respondent.

Keen O'Kelley & Spitz, A. Frank…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York v. BedingfieldSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  2. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. CarltonSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  3. Fink v. FinkSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  4. Phillips v. City of West Palm BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  5. M. T. Smith & Son Drilling Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Martinez v. ScanlanSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Walker & LaBerge, Inc. v. HalliganSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  3. FLA. ERECTION SERV. INC. v. McDonaldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. City of Clermont v. RumphDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. State Ex Rel. Ervin v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1964

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API