Legal Opinion
City of Clermont v. Rumph
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 11, 1984No. AU-438PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
450 So.2d 573 (1984)
CITY OF CLERMONT and Aetna Insurance Company, Appellants,
v.
William RUMPH, Appellee.
No. AU-438.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 11, 1984.
Rehearing Denied June 13, 1984.
James M. Hess, of Driscoll, Langston & Kane, Orlando, for appellants.
Joseph E. Smith, of Hurt & Parrish, Bill McCabe, of Shepherd, McCabe & Cooley, Orlando, for appellee.
WENTWORTH, Judge.
Employer/carrier appeal a workers' compensation order and assert that a 1983 amendment to § 440.15(3)(b)2, Florida Statutes, precludes an award of wage loss benefits in this case. We affirm the order…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sullivan v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
- Regency Inn v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Miami Dolphins, Ltd. v. Metro. Dade CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- HS Camp & Sons v. FlynnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Kerce v. Coca-Cola Company-Foods DivisionSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- HS Camp & Sons v. FlynnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Litvin v. ST. LUCIE CTY. SHERIFF'S DEPT.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Tampa Elec. Co. v. BradshawDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Kenz v. Miami-Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Butler v. Bay Center/Chubb Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.