Legal Opinion

City of Medina v. Osiecki

Medina Municipal Court

Decided August 12, 2009No. Nos. 08 CRB 00218 and 08 TRD 01583Published

1Opinion of the Court

Chase, Judge.

{¶ 1} This matter is before the court on the defendant’s motion for an order granting him attorney fees for a defense against a charge of improper transport of a firearm.

{¶ 2} R.C. 9.68 provides: “(A) The individual right to keep and bear arms, being a fundamental individual right that predates the United States Constitution and Ohio Constitution, and being a constitutionally protected right in every part of Ohio, the general assembly finds the need to provide uniform laws throughout the state regulating the ownership, possession, purchase, other acquisition, transport, storage,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zimmie v. ZimmieOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Sturm v. SturmOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Hansel v. Creative Concrete & Masonry Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Nielsen v. Firelands Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Ohioans for Concealed Carry v. City of Clyde, S-06-039 (4-13-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API