Legal Opinion

People v. Frazier

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 19, 1984No. 4-83-0204PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Miller

The defendant was tried by a jury, convicted of driving while under the influence of alcohol, and sentenced to 300 days’ imprisonment. An analysis of the defendant’s breath an hour after his arrest revealed a blood-alcohol concentration of .28, and this information was introduced into evidence. On appeal the defendant argues that the results of the breath test should not have been used at trial and that the jury received misleading instructions on the subject of intoxication. The defendant also argues that he was not proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. We conclude that no reversible…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. FisherIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. HesterIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. AndrusIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. People v. RomanoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  5. People v. ThomasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API