Legal Opinion

People v. Romano

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 31, 1985No. 83-0471PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lindberg

Defendant John Romano was charged by indictment on August 3, 1982, with the offense of reckless homicide and was convicted after a seven-day jury trial. On appeal, defendant contends the trial court committed reversible error by admitting the results of a chemical analysis performed on his blood because the sample was not handled properly and because he did not consent to the blood test, and also erred in allowing the admission of his statements at the hospital because he was in custody, but received no Miranda warnings. Finally, defendant argues the trial court erred in allowing the jury to…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. The PEOPLE v. GregoryIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  5. People v. ToddIllinois Supreme Court · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. MilhollinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. People v. ThomasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  3. People v. BatesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  4. People v. TurkenichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. People v. VasquezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API