Legal Opinion

Priester Et Ux v. Thrall Et Ux

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1961Published

1Opinion of the Court

229 Or. 184 (1961)

349 P.2d 866

365 P.2d 1050

PRIESTER ET UX

v.

THRALL ET UX

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Submitted September 12, 1961.

Motion to dismiss denied March 2, 1960.

Affirmed November 1, 1961.

Petition for rehearing denied November 28, 1961.

Davis, Jensen, Martin & Robertson, Portland, for the motion.

Lenske, Spiegel & Spiegel, Portland, contra.

Reuben Lenske, Portland, for appellants.

No appearance for respondents.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

MOTION DENIED.

ROSSMAN, J.

This cause which was instituted pursuant to the provisions of our laws which authorize the maintenance of forcible entry and wrongful…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Namba v. McCourt and NeunerOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Danvers v. DurkinOregon Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Priester Et Ux v. Thrall Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Heiney v. HeineyOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Zelig v. Blue Point Oyster Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API