Legal Opinion

Namba v. McCourt and Neuner

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1948PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from a declaratory decree of the Circuit Court which held that our Alien Land Law (§61-101 to and including §61-112, O. C. L. A.) and Oregon Laws 1945, Chapter 436, which contains provisions ancillary to the Alien Land Law, are valid legislation. The purpose of the suit which resulted in the challenged declaratory decree was to secure a holding that both of those acts are unconstitutional.

The appellants present these assignments of error:

1. “The Court erred in declaring that Sections 61-101 to 61-111, O. C. L. A., are constitutional, valid and enforceable.”

2…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Fong Yue Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State of Oregon v. PirkeyOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Warren v. MARION COUNTYOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Sei Fujii v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. State Land Board v. BrownellOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Lehndorff Geneva, Inc. v. WarrenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API