Legal Opinion

Zelig v. Blue Point Oyster Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1909PublishedCited by 5 opinions

This is an action of forcible entry and detainer by M. A. Zelig against the Blue Point Oyster Co. and Sam Mackin. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendants appeal. Plaintiff now moves to dismiss the appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Slater

On December 26, 1908, in an action of forcible entry and detainer brought in the circuit court of Multnomah County under the provisions of Chapter 18, Title 63, Code, as amended by the act of February 23, 1907 (Laws 1907, p. 132), plaintiffs obtained a judgment against defendants for the restitution of certain store premises in the City of Portland. Defendants gave an oral notice of appeal, and on December 29, 1908, attempted to perfect their appeal by serving and filing an undertaking as required by Section 550, B. & C. Comp., with a provision for stay of proceedings, substantially in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mayhall v. EppingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. State v. FisherOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Taylor v. LaphamOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Thompson v. WolfOregon Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Danvers v. DurkinOregon Supreme Court · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Friedenthal v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Wilson v. MatthewsOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Priester Et Ux v. Thrall Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Peck v. RossOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Priester Et Ux v. Thrall Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API