Hartingh v. Bay Circuit Judge
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus by George Hartingh and others, as trustees of the village of Pinconning, against Chester L. Collins, one of the circuit judges for the county of Bay, to compel respondent to vacate a preliminary injunction issued in a suit in which the attorney general is complainant and relators are defendants.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
In this proceeding relators, who are members of the council of the village of Pinconning, Bay county, pray for a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to vacate an order made by him on April 23, 1913, denying a motion ,to dissolve a preliminary injunction, and to dissolve said injunction. It appears that on April 14, 1913, the attorney general, on relation of John W. Kinsey, Albert Butler, and John C. Salmon, three residents and property owners of said village, filed an injunction bill in the *291Bay circuit court, in chancery, and on application to respondent a temporary injunction was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Attorney General ex rel. Cook v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- People v. SchafranMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Rohde v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Taggart v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Fuchs v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Reaves v. Sunset Branch, National Bank of South Dakota (In Re Reaves)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1981
- Attorney General v. MurrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Yanshak AppealLuzerne County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1949