People v. Schafran
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before sentence from the recorder’s court of the city of Detroit; Connolly, J. Frank Schafran was convicted of engaging in the business of selling intoxicating liquors without a license.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
The respondent was convicted in the recorder’s court of the city of Detroit of having engaged in the business of selling and keeping for sale distilled, brewed, fermented, malt, mixed, spirituous, and intoxicating liquors on January 26, 1911, at No. 1,043 Russell street, in the city of Detroit, he not having had a valid license to engage in such business, as provided by Act No. 291, Pub. Acts 1909, commonly known as the “ Warner-Cramton Law.” It was also averred in the information that the license theretofore issued to respondent under said act had been revoked by reason of his violations of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Beer Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Stone v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Gundling v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Bertholf v. . O'ReillyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bundo v. City of Walled LakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Fitzpatrick v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Eastwood Park Amusement Co. v. Mayor of East DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Alphonse Lewis, Jr. v. City of Grand RapidsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
- Matto's, Inc. v. Olde Colonie Place (In Re Matto's, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.