Legal Opinion
Nat'l Assoc. for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice v. Beryl A Howell
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 14, 2017No. 16-5020PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Circuit Judge:
The National Association for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice (“NAAMJP”) has conducted a thirty-year campaign to overturn local rules of practice limiting those who may appear before a particular state or federal court. See NAAMJP v. Simandle, 658 Fed.Appx. 127, 130 (3d Cir. 2016) (noting NAAMJP has “crisscrossed the United States, challenging local bar admission rules”); Blye v. California Supreme Court, No. 11-cv-5046, 2014 WL 229830, at *2 n.3 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2014) (collecting cases dating back to 1987). We now join the chorus of judicial opinions…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Shume v. Pearson Educ. Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Doyle v. PalmerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- Joshua A. Gray v. Department of Public SafetySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2021
- Bellinger v. BowserDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Brokamp v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.