Legal Opinion

Evancho v. Pine-Richland School District

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 27, 2017No. Civil No. 2:16-01537PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION *

Mark R. Hornak,- United States District Judge

The three high' school student Plaintiffs are each transgender, and all are in their senior year at Pine-Richland (Pa.) High School (“High School”). ECF 43 at ¶ 15. Two of them, Juliet Evancho and Elissa Ridenour, each over eighteen years old, had “male” listed on their birth certificates when they were born.1 That of the third Plaintiff, A.S. (also a high school senior, but not yet eighteen years old), said “female.” For some time, Juliet Evancho and Elissa Ridenour have lived all facets of their lives as girls, and A.S. has done so as a…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  4. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  5. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. SkrmettiSupreme Court of the United States · 2025
  2. Doe v. TrumpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  3. M.A.B. v. Bd. of Educ. of Talbot Cnty.District Court, D. Maryland · 2018
  4. Drew Adams v. School Board of St. Johns County FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  5. F.V. v. BarronDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2018

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API