Freeman v. Sugar Mountain Resort, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Chief Judge.
First we consider whether the trial court erred by granting defendant’s summary judgment motion. Plaintiff argues that there were genuine issues of material fact as to whether defendant was negligent. We agree.
Summary judgment is properly granted when the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, admissions and affidavits show no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 56 (1990); Davis v. Town of Southern Pines, 116 N.C. App. 663, 665, 449 S.E.2d 240, 242 (1994), disc. review denied, 339…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Nelson v. FreelandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Norwood v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Lamm v. Bissette Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Davis v. Town of Southern PinesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Matthieu v. Piedmont Natural Gas CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Strawbridge v. Sugar Mountain Resort, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2004
- Royal v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Keech v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Stricklin v. StefaniDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2018
- Freeman v. Sugar Mountain Resort, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.