Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hand v. Greyhound Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1956No. 33465Published

1DissentRosellini, J.

(dissenting) — The majority admit that § 2, Laws of 1939, chapter 41, p. 121 [cf. RCW 51.24.010], may be arbitrary and unreasonable under the results reached in Latimer v. Western Machinery Exchange, 42 Wn. (2d) 756, 259 P. (2d) 623, and Jewett v. Kerwood, 43 Wn. (2d) 691, 263 P. (2d) 830, but decline to declare the statute invalid because they conclude that such an attack upon the statute is hypothetical and not necessarily pertinent to the instant case.

In the Jewett case, we held that an employer driving his own truck in an extrahazardous occupation who negligently injured an employee…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Grasse v. Dealer's Transport Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Boeing Aircraft Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Latimer v. Western MacHinery ExchangeWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Pink v. Rayonier, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Jewett v. KerwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API