Legal Opinion

Ulstruck v. Home Assn.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 19, 1926No. 24,844PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien wherein two liens were estab listed. The owner and the mortgagee appeal from the order denying their motion for modified findings or a new trial.

The contracts for the work performed by the lien claimants were made with the defendant The Home Association. The association appears to have begun the construction of a large building on lots it owned. While the work was in progress, it got into financial stress and proceedings were had in the Federal court, with the result that a receiver was appointed to take charge of its property. A consent decree was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Erickson v. IrelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. White Enamel Refrigerator Co. v. KruseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. City of Ortonville v. GeerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  4. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  5. Brown v. W. W. Heffelfinger Realty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rupp v. Earl H. Cline & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  2. Federal Land Bank v. GreenMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Terry J. Kolb v. Scherer Brothers Financial Services Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  4. Kolb v. Scherer Bros. Financial ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  5. Lyman Lumber Co. v. Cornerstone Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API