Legal Opinion

Rupp v. Earl H. Cline & Sons, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 25, 1963No. [No. 155, September Term, 1962.]PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHornby, J.

This appeal is from an order allowing the mechanics’ lien claims of the claimants-appellees (Earl H. Cline and Sons, Inc., et al.) priority in the distribution of proceeds of a foreclosure sale under a deed of trust held by the trustees-appellants (Christopher A. Rupp and Sidney H. Tinley, Jr., trustees under deed of trust from James T. Galloway Company, a body corporate). Subsequent to the filing of the foreclosure proceedings by the trustees, the claimants filed a petition alleging that work done on the foreclosed premises had begun prior to the recording of the deed of trust and prayed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pennock v. HooverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1835
  2. Brooks v. LesterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
  3. Kelly v. RosenstockCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
  4. National Lumber Co. v. Farmer & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. Kiene v. HodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Diversified Mortgage Investors v. Lloyd D. Blaylock General Contractor, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. H. B. Deal Construction Co. v. Labor Discount Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  3. Montana Department of Natural Resources & Conservation v. Intake Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Steuart Petroleum Co. v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Prince George's County v. Sunrise Development Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API