Legal Opinion
Knorr-Bremse Systeme Fuer Nutzfahrzeuge GmbH v. Dana Corp.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided June 6, 2005No. CIV.A. 1:00CV803PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLIS, District Judge.
In this remanded patent infringement action, the plaintiff sued three of its competitors in the worldwide brake industry for literal and willful infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,927,445 (the ’445 patent), which claims an invention in the field of air disk brakes used in large commercial road vehicles. Following a Markman 1 claim construction hearing and various summary
judgment rulings, a bench trial was held on the remaining infringement and validity-issues, resulting in findings of literal and willful infringement, an award of partial attorney’s fees…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Comark Communications, Inc. v. Harris CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- The Read Corporation and F.T. Read & Sons, Inc. v. Portec, Inc., D/B/A Portec/kolberg DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Carroll Touch, Inc. v. Electro Mechanical Systems, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Rambus, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
- Loops, LLC v. Amercare Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2008