Gary H. v. Hegstrom
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:
Ten years ago, after complaints about the management of Oregon’s MacLaren facility for adolescent wards of the juvenile court failed to bring about desired reforms, eleven inmates filed a class action. Seven years later, after numerous attempts to settle the case, the district court entered a decree enjoining, on federal constitutional grounds, some eighteen pages of instructions for managing the institution. The state appeals.
The case has not become moot even though the original plaintiffs have become adults. New inmates have taken their places. Counsel for both sides…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hoptowit v. RayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Oscar W. Jones v. Lou Blanas County of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Gallo Cattle Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Paige Ray-Cluney v. Charles PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Walter D. Balla v. Idaho State Board of Corrections, Walter D. Balla v. Idaho State Board of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Samantha Vazquez v. County of KernCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.