Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Wootan

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1891No. 86PublishedCited by 21 opinions

From the Floyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCrumpacker, J.

Henry Wootan, a minor, by next friend, sued Benjamin K. Taylor and Joseph E. Taylor in the Floyd Circuit Court to recover damages for an injury alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff while in the employment of the Taylors in their manufactory at New Albany.

The complaint contains three paragraphs, and a separate demurrer was filed to each paragraph and overruled, to which exceptions were duly taken.

Issues were joined by general denial, and the cause was tried by a jury, and resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff below.

At the proper time appellants’ counsel requested that the jury be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Coombs v. New Bedford Cordage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  3. Sullivan v. India Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  4. Hayden v. Smithville Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
  5. Carr v. HaysIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Knight v. KnightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Railroad v. BerryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. FennIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Parke County Coal Co. v. BarthIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Citizens' Street Railroad v. SpahrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API