Legal Opinion

Hobbs v. Cunningham

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 20, 1930PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is a bill in equity brought under G. L. c. 175, § 113, as amended by St. 1923, c. 149, § 2, to reach and apply in satisfaction of a final judgment obtained by the plaintiff against the defendant Cunningham, the obligation of the defendant Eagle Indemnity Company (herein referred to as the defendant) under a policy of automobile liability insurance. The case was heard by a judge of the Superior Court who made certain findings of fact and ordered a final decree to be entered in favor of the plaintiff. From this decree the defendant appealed. The defendant also excepted to the denial of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Opinion of the Justices to the Senate & the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  2. Blood v. . KaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Welch v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  4. Bingham v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  5. Hagar v. NortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Carilli v. HerseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Gensinger v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  3. Collins v. Northwest Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Stuck v. SchummMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Trustees of the Boston & Maine Corp. v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API