Legal Opinion

Bingham v. Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 21, 1924PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is a complaint for the abatement of an income tax. The testator, of whose will the complainants are executors, died on February 27, 1921. After their appointment as executors and during 1921 the complainants sold intangible personal property of the estate of the testator at a considerable advance over its cost to the testator, who acquired it subsequent to January 1, 1916, but at a price *80less than its fair market value on the date of the death of the testator or at the time of the qualification of his executors. An income tax was levied on the difference between the cost to the testator…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. MerriamSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Tax Commissioner v. PutnamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. Eaton, Crane & Pike Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. Hooper v. BradfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  5. Another v. Brookline Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Bolster v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation v. DaltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Hobbs v. CunninghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  4. Nichols v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  5. United States Trust Co. v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API