Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Singh

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided September 25, 2003PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment of conviction unanimously modified on the law by reversing defendant’s conviction of aggravated harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.30 [2]) and dismissing that part of the accusatory instrument charging him with said crime; as so modified, affirmed.

On appeal, defendant raises issues regarding the sufficiency of the accusatory instrument, insofar as it charged him with aggravated harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.30 [2]), and the trial court’s charge to the jury. A person is guilty of violating Penal Law § 240.30 (2) when,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. People v. ShackNew York Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. HernandezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2005
  2. People v. ThompsonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2010
  3. People v. AlfanoWebster Justice of the Peace Court · 2004
  4. People v. CollezoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. People v. CruzCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API