Legal Opinion

Pipes v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 13, 2017No. 15-1163PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

10 U.S.C. § 1204 (Retirement for Military on Active Duty for 30 days or less or on Inactive-duty Training); 25 U.S.C. § 2501 (Statute of Limitations); 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (Tucker Act Jurisdiction); Air Force Instruction (“AFI”); AFI 10-248 (Fitness Program); AFI 36-2254 (Reserve Personnel Participation); AFI 36-2910 (Line of Duty Determination, Medical Continuation (MEDCON) and Incapacitation (INCAP) pay); AFI 36-3212 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, and Separation); AFI 48-123 (Medical Examinations and Standards); Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”)…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Exnicios v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  2. Pipes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  3. Pipes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
  4. Pipes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API