Legal Opinion
Pipes v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 11, 2018No. 15-1163Published
1Opinion of the Court
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 15-1163 Filed: September 11, 2018 **************************************** * *
10 U.S.C. §§ 101(d)(7) (defining “inactive- * duty training”), 1204 (Retirement for * Military on Active Duty for 30 days or * less or on Inactive-duty Training); MALCOLM PIPES, *
28 U.S.C. § 1491
(Tucker Act Jurisdiction); * Air Force Instruction (“AFI”) 10-248 Plaintiff, * (May 26, 2004) (Fitness Program); * Air Force Manual 36-8001 (Jan. 22, 2004) * (Reserve Personnel Participation and v. * Training Procedures); * Rules of the United States Court of Federal * Claims…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Kenneth L. Wronke v. John A. Marsh, as Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Gregory C. Porter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Wyatt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Hoskins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.