Habig v. Gohagan
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KAROHL, Judge.
John Gohagan, husband, appeals an amended order of the circuit court that reduced child support for his son and a maintenance obligation. Annette Habig, wife, cross-appeals. There is no longer a need for child support because of emancipation. Both parties claim the trial court erred in its modification of maintenance. In addition, husband contends the trial court erred in denying his motion for relief from an order that granted wife an award for unpaid child support, because it was irregular. We affirm.
The pertinent facts are as follows. On April 20, 1990, the trial court…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Burris v. Terminal RR Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Early v. EarlyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Crowley v. CrowleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
3Cited by4 opinions
- Henderson v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Ginther v. TaubCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Schouest v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2015
- Marriage of Norman v. Van NormanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995