Legal Opinion

Burris v. Terminal RR Ass'n

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 21, 1992No. 60505PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARD, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from an order denying their motion for relief from a final judgment under Rule 74.06. Plaintiffs had sought to vacate an order dismissing their claim with prejudice for failure to comply with court-mandated discovery on the grounds that the order was irregular and their non-compliance with discovery was the result of excusable neglect. We affirm.

The record shows that plaintiff James Burris filed a personal injury action arising from injuries which he alleged occurred May 18, 1988 in the course of his employment as a watchman for defendant Terminal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barney v. SuggsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  2. State Ex Rel. Willens v. GrayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Fischer, Spuhl, Herzwurm & Associates, Inc. v. Forrest T. Jones & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. M.S. Conway Construction Co. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cotleur v. DanzigerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  2. Baxi v. United Technologies Automotive Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Kerth v. Polestar EntertainmentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Finley v. St. John's Mercy Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Estep v. AtkinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API