Legal Opinion

Schouest v. Medtronic, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided March 20, 2015No. Civil Action G-13-203PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum and Order

GRAY H. MILLER, District Judge.

Pending before the court is defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs first amended complaint. Dkt. 50. After considering the motion, all responses, and the applicable law, the court is of the opinion that the motion should be GRANTED.

I. Background

This case was originally assigned to Judge Gregg Costa in the Galveston District of the Southern District of Texas, but was reassigned to this court in October 2014. Dkt. 64. When the court considered defendants’ first motion to dismiss plaintiffs original complaint, it wrote a *608substantial opinion…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Martin K. Eby Construction Company, Inc. v. Dallas Area Rapid TransitCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  3. James Stephen Jones v. M.L. Greninger, M.L. Greninger Yolanda Cornelius Ralph FigueroaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  4. Spivey v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  5. Ernst & Young, L.L.P. v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bulox v. CooperSurgical, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2025
  2. Miles v. Boston Scientific CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2020
  3. Savoia-McHugh v. McCraryDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2021
  4. Sweat v. Houston Methodist HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API