Legal Opinion

Pence v. California Mining Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1904No. 1514PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Third District Court, Summit County. —Hon. G. W. Morse, Judge. Action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by tbe negligence of the defendant. Prom a judgment in favor of tbe plaintiff, tbe defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBartch, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries which tbe plaintiff alleges be received because of tbe negligence of tbe defendant. It is alleged in tbe complaint, among other things, that tbe plaintiff, at tbe time of tbe accident which resulted in bis injury, was a young man about twenty-two years old, wholly inexperienced as a miner, unfamiliar with drilling and blasting and tbe use of powder and fuse; that be applied to tbe defendant’s foreman for work at its mine; that tbe foreman, knowing bis inexperience, assigned him to work drilling and blasting alone in a tunnel,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Des Moines Valley R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  2. Lowe v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1896
  3. St. Louis & South-Eastern Railway Co. v. MyrtleIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Knight v. FisherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  5. Fritz v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Brigham Young University v. LillywhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  2. Broadview Leasing Co. v. Cape Central Airways, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Chatelain v. ThackerayUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Ehalt v. McCarthyUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Wilson v. GardnerUtah Supreme Court · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API