Legal Opinion
Beit Bros. v. Irving Tanning Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 29, 1944PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
This is an action of contract arising out of the nonacceptance of a carload of hides. There was a verdict for the plaintiff, and the only question presented is the correctness of the refusal of the trial judge to direct a verdict for the defendant.
The following facts were not in question: On December 14, 1939, by a written contract entered into through one Isaacson, a hide broker representing both parties, the plaintiff agreed to sell, and the defendant agreed to buy, “One carload, estimated about 8/900 allweight hides. . . . All-weights, average, estimated about 44/45 lbs., all new standard…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Weiner v. D. A. Schulte, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Hanson & Parker, Ltd. v. WittenbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Botti v. Venice Grocery Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Agoos Kid Co. v. Blumenthal Import Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Gerrish Dredging Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Costonis v. Medford Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- MacDonald v. GoughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Pochi v. BrettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Coburn v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Nathan v. Tremont Storage Warehouse, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.