Legal Opinion
McMEIL v. Jantran, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided March 13, 2003No. 02-2045PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
DAWSON, District Judge.
On this 13th day of March 2003, there comes on for consideration the Plaintiffs motion for retroactive and future increase of maintenance rate. (Doc. # 52.) Defendant Jantran filed a response in opposition, (doc. # 56), and Plaintiff filed a reply. (Doc. # 60.) An evidentiary hearing on the motion was held on March 6, 2003 in Fort Smith. Plaintiff appeared with his attorney, Christopher Kuebler, and defendant Jantran was represented by its counsel, Tom Janoush.
Plaintiff brought this suit for damages under the Jones Act, 46 App. U.S.C.A. § 688, and general…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Kossick v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dean v. Fishing Co. of Alaska, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2013
- Padilla v. Maersk Line, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Loftin v. Kirby Inland Marine, L.P.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2007
- B & C SEAFOOD LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- Dean v. Fishing Co. of AlaskaWashington Supreme Court · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.