Legal Opinion
States v. 5 Cases
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 4, 1949No. Nos. 4359-4353PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HINCKS, Chief Judge.
This action arises out of a libel by the Government, pursuant to Section 334 of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C.A. Sec. 301 et seq., resulting in a seizure of five cases more or less of cans of oil, alleged to have been adulterated and misbranded. It is presently before the Court on a motion by the Antonio Corrao Corporation, as claimant of the libelled merchandise, for an order requiring the government to produce true and exact copies of “each and every chemical test and analysis” made 'by the government on the samples taken by it from the seized…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Four Hundred & Forty-Three Cans of Frozen Egg Product v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Martin v. Capital Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
- United States v. 935 CASES MORE OR LESS, ETC.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
- Gordon v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Freeman v. SeligsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Certain Parcels of LandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
- Republic of China v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1956
- United States v. National Steel Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1960
- Houdry Process Corp. v. Commonwealth Oil Refining Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.