Legal Opinion

Hodges v. Hamblen County

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1925PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Green

The county of Hamblen is entitled to eighteen magistrates, and this number were duly elected and qualified prior to the meeting of the regular session of the quarterly court of that county on the first Monday in January, 1925. Eight of these magistrates absented themselves from the January term of the quarterly court, and refused to participate in the deliberations of that body. It seems that differences had arisen between these eight magistrates and the others about certain matters to come before the court, and the eight magistrates organized this filibuster by way of breaking a quorum.

Ouster…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Miller v. MillerTennessee Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Nashville, C. & St. LR Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. State v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Washington-Detroit Theatre Co. v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Cummings v. BeelerTennessee Supreme Court · 1949

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API