Legal Opinion
Pope v. Missouri Pacific Railroad
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided January 11, 1978No. CIV-77-1064-DPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.
This is an action wherein Plaintiff seeks to recover damages allegedly incurred as a result of the death of Plaintiff’s husband which occurred when his car and one of Defendant’s trains collided at a railroad crossing located near Neodesha, Kansas. It is asserted that the Court has subject matter jurisdiction of this action by reason of diversity of citizenship and amount in controversy pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
Defendant has filed herein a Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative to Transfer and a Brief in support thereof. Plaintiff has filed both a Response and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Continental Grain Co. v. Barge FBL-585Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Shutte v. Armco Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Van Howell v. Joe D. Tanner, Individually and as Commissioner of Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Hess v. GrayDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
- Cunningham v. CunninghamDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
- Johnston v. Foster-Wheeler Constructors, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1994
- Dworkin v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.