Legal Opinion

Shipes v. Hanover Insurance

District Court, M.D. Georgia

Decided July 1, 1988No. Civ. A. 87-69-3-MAC (WDO)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

OWENS, Chief Judge.

On September 30, 1987, this court issued an order in the above-captioned case granting plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of the proper calculation of benefits due an injured employee pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 33-34-8(c). See Shipes v. Hanover Insurance Co., 670 F.Supp. 354 (M.D.Ga. 1987). Now pending before the court is defendant Hanover Insurance Company’s motion of March 14, 1988, in which defendant Hanover moves for summary judgment on plaintiff’s claims premised upon O.C.G.A. § 33-34-6(b) and (c). Those subsections, the relevant portions of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Carlin Communication, Inc., Etc. v. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  2. Mid-South Grizzlies v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  3. Roslyn Friedman, Individually and for All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. William MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  4. Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. MoweryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ray Shipes v. The Hanover Insurance Company, Ray Shipes v. Hanover Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API