State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Harper
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Judge.
The defendant makes three principal contentions: (1) that since the plaintiffs recovered under the Ford policy they were not entitled to recover any sums *698under the Corvair policy; (2) that the amount paid under the uninsured motorists coverage should be reduced by the amounts paid under medical payments coverage; (3) that in view of the novel legal questions presented there was no legal basis for the imposition of bad faith penalty and attorney’s fees.
In this case there were two separate insurance policies — the Ford policy and the Corvair policy. The inception of both…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dependable Insurance Co. v. GibbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MurphySupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- Gulf American Fire & Casualty Co. v. McNealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Exchange Bank v. LohSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Cameron Mutual Insurance Co. v. MaddenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Grange Mutual Casualty Co. v. VolkmannOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Ray Shipes v. The Hanover Insurance Company, Ray Shipes v. Hanover Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Bass v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. GozaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.