Hoffmeister v. State Industrial Accident Commission
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBelt, C. J.
This is a Workmen’s Compensation case. There are no questions of fact involved. A general demurrer was sustained to the further and separate answers of the State Industrial Accident Commission and, upon its refusal further to plead, judgment upon the pleadings was entered in favor of the plaintiff claimant directing the commission to reinstate an award of permanent total disability. From such judgment the commission appeals.
The pleading's disclose the following factual situation in so far as it is material to a consideration of the question presented on appeal:
On June 27, 1933, the commission…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Matter of Marhoffer v. . MarhofferNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Chebot v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- New York Indemnity Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
- Brown Bros. v. ParksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Kajundzich v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Compensation of Harris v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Dimitroff v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Holmes v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Waldroup v. J. C. Penney Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Southern Wooden Box Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.