Legal Opinion

McClaflin v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 2005No. 05CA0057PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHawthorne, J.

Petitioner, Susan B. McClaflin (claimant), seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) affirming a hearing officer’s decision determining that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment benefits. We affirm.

A deputy determined that claimant was ineligible to receive benefits during the applicable period because she was not actively seeking work as required under the statutory scheme. See § 8 — 73—107(l)(g)(I), C.R.S. 2005. Claimant appealed, and the matter proceeded to a hearing.

The hearing officer found that claimant, a long-time employee of King Soopers…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bayly Manufacturing Co. v. Department of EmploymentSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  2. Hallahan v. RileySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1946
  3. Arteaga v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Claim of Hart v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hoskins v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API