Claim of Hart v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge HUME.
Petitioner, M. Keith Hart (claimant), seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Panel which affirmed a determination of the hearing officer that claimant was not entitled to a waiver of his obligation to repay unemployment compensation benefits he had been overpaid. We affirm.
I
Claimant contends that the hearing officer and Panel improperly applied Department of Labor & Employment Regulation 15.1, 7 Code Colo. Reg. 1101-2 (1994), in determining whether his waiver requést should be granted. We find no reversible error.
A review of the history of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Goodwill Industries v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Jones v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
- Melton by and Through Melton v. LarrabeeColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Southwest Forest Industries, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
- Muhlenkamp v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the StateColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
3Cited by5 opinions
- Davis v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- Herrera v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
- McClaflin v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
- Alfaro v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- Claim of Hart v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1995