Legal Opinion

Claim of Hart v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 1995No. 94CA1714PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge HUME.

Petitioner, M. Keith Hart (claimant), seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Panel which affirmed a determination of the hearing officer that claimant was not entitled to a waiver of his obligation to repay unemployment compensation benefits he had been overpaid. We affirm.

I

Claimant contends that the hearing officer and Panel improperly applied Department of Labor & Employment Regulation 15.1, 7 Code Colo. Reg. 1101-2 (1994), in determining whether his waiver requést should be granted. We find no reversible error.

A review of the history of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Goodwill Industries v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Jones v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Melton by and Through Melton v. LarrabeeColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Southwest Forest Industries, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Muhlenkamp v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the StateColorado Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Herrera v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. McClaflin v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Alfaro v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Claim of Hart v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API