Legal Opinion

Heinz v. Chicago Road Investment Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 11, 1996No. Docket 169059, 169075Published

1Opinion of the Court

549 N.W.2d 47 (1996)

216 Mich. App. 289

Robert F. HEINZ and Dawne M. Heinz, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

CHICAGO ROAD INVESTMENT COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

Robert F. HEINZ and Dawne M. Heinz, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

CHICAGO ROAD INVESTMENT COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket Nos. 169059, 169075.

Court of Appeals of Michigan.

Submitted November 14, 1995, at Detroit.

Decided April 12, 1996, at 9:05 a.m.

Released for Publication June 11, 1996.

Turner & Turner, P.C. by Matthew L. Turner, Southfield, for plaintiffs.

O'Leary, O'Leary, Jacobs, Mattson & Perry, P.C. by John P. Jacobs, Southfield, for defendant.

Bef…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. People v. StanawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Lorencz v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Marquis v. Hartford Accident & IndemnityMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. City of Detroit v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Altman v. Meridian TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API