School Directors v. . Asheville
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
This action was before us upon complaint and demurrer at February Term, 1901 (128 N.C. 249). It was then decided that the plaintiff was entitled to maintain the action for the recovery of the fines collected by the defendant in the manner set forth in the complaint. The cause was thereupon referred for the purpose of ascertaining the amount of fines collected, etc. Upon the filing of the report the plaintiff moved for judgment for the amount found to be due by the referee. Defendant resisted the motion, etc. Judgment was rendered as set forth in the record. Defendant excepted and appealed.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- City of Hastings v. FoxworthyNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Katzenstein v. Raleigh & Gaston RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- Sutton v. . PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- State v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Board of Education v. Town of HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- McGovern v. EckhartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Shore v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Cauble v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Cauble v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Shavitz v. City of High PointCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.