Legal Opinion
Greater Cincinnati Chamber of Commerce v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 17, 1989No. 89-3158PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Before NELSON and BOGGS, Circuit Judges, and ALDRICH, District Judge.* BOGGS, Circuit Judge.
The petitioners, the Greater Cincinnati Chamber of Commerce, Dupont Corp., Quantum Chemical Corp., Cincinnati Gas and Electric Co., and Procter & Gamble Co. (petitioners) seek review of the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) action finding the Ohio State Implementation Plan (SIP) “substantially inadequate to achieve the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for sulfur dioxide in Hamilton County,” and calling for the State to “cure the inadequacies in the SIP by revising it.” On…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Harrison v. PPG Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Calvin Geyen, Jr. v. John O. Marsh, Jr., Secretary of the United States ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- First Federal Savings Bank and Trust v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- The Greater Cincinnati Chamber Of Commerce v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989