Legal Opinion

The Greater Cincinnati Chamber Of Commerce v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 17, 1989No. 89-3158PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

879 F.2d 1379

30 ERC 1265, 19 Envtl. L. Rep. 21,383

The GREATER CINCINNATI CHAMBER OF COMMERCE; Dupont Corp.;

General Electric Co.; Quantum Chemical Corp.;

The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co.; The

Procter & Gamble Co., Petitioners,

v.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent.

No. 89-3158.

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

Argued May 26, 1989.

Decided July 17, 1989.

Robert L. Brubaker (argued), Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, Columbus, Ohio, for the Greater Cincinnati Chamber of Commerce.

Ross Austin, DuPont Corp. Legal Dept., Wilmington, Del., for Dupont Corp.

Peter Van Allen,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Harrison v. PPG Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  5. Calvin Geyen, Jr. v. John O. Marsh, Jr., Secretary of the United States ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. First Federal Savings Bank & Trust v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API