Legal Opinion

Ellis v. Roberts Et Ux.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 1929No. Appeal 79PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

Plaintiff entered judgment against Carl H. Roberts and Bessie M., his wife, on a judgment note executed and delivered by them to him. On considering the testimony taken on a rule to open the judgment, the court below discharged the rule. Prom that order we have this appeal by defendants.

There is no conflict as to the main, material facts. Plaintiff is a real estate broker and Mr. Roberts, one of the defendants, is in the leaded glass business in Philadelphia. Defendants averred in their petition that on November 24,1926, they entered into a written agreement with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Keck v. BieberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  2. March v. AllaboughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  3. Streeper v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
  4. Emery v. BoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  5. Sautter v. RowlandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Traylor v. GraftonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Stein v. BruceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Holmes Electric Protective Co. v. GoldsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Vrooman v. MilgramSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Berwick v. Daniel W. Keuler Realtors, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API